No, chocolate is not better than kissing.
From the BBC, we get the news that Chocolate is ‘better than kissing’.
What’s “better”? How about “different”?
The article defines “better” as “a more intense and longer lasting ‘buzz’.”
I did a little interview with the loser of this competition, and I think he makes a very valid point in his own defense.
“I didn’t train for this contest,” said Kissing. “If I did, I’d be dead meat for what I’m actually meant to do. Sustained satisfaction? Dude, what kind of criterion is that? ‘Sall well and good if you ain’t got no stake in propagating the species. Look here, does chocolate care about making human babies? Not last I heard. I do, so I’ll be doggoned if I’m gonna leave folks satisfied with kissing! Getting folks’ lips together don’t get the job done, knowwtI’m talkin’?”
I know what he’s talkin’. I love theobromine, and chocolate helps me blog. But if it’s something bigger than a post I want to produce, kissing just might be the better stimulant, knowwtI’m talkin’? Y’all who want families, please don’t get confused about this.